There are a
surprising number of people who are still interested in poetry of one kind or
another. Many people remember poems they studied in school. Robert Frost, TS
Eliot, Emily Dickinson, Frank O’Hara, Langston Hughes, Edgar Allan Poe, Maya
Angelou, William Carlos Williams, e.e. cummings, and Dylan Thomas are some of
the poets generally studied in high school, and many, if they had a good
English teacher, will remember the impact that their poems had on them.
But what role can
poetry play in life? That’s a tricky question. Can we survive without ever
hearing another word of poetry? Certainly. Does poetry have anything like a
practical use? Well, not really. But couldn’t you say the same about music, art
and literature? Yet, most people would protest if they were told they had to
give them up completely. Why? Because they recognize that, despite their
apparent uselessness, they are life-enhancing. They help us to make sense of
the world we live in, they provide an escape from stress and pressure, and they
give us pleasure on an esthetic level. It is a fact that our emotional and
psychological state can, and often does, affect our actions, and to that extent
the arts do have a practical application.
Good poetry can
move the heart, raise the mind to a higher level, comfort the bereaved, console
the dejected, strengthen the weak-willed, lighten the spirit, and even
galvanize the body into action. Although it does not necessarily have a direct utilitarian
purpose, poetry can still have a sizable impact indirectly.
So why don’t
more people read poetry? One probable reason is that good poetry often requires
work. To understand what a poem is trying to say may involve the reader in
cerebral activity and perhaps some people are put off by that. In some cases,
it is a legitimate criticism of poetry that it is too opaque for the man in the
street to derive much benefit from reading it. There is nothing wrong with
poetry needing to be worked at, but if no amount of work yields a payload of
comprehension then is it worth it? Is it good poetry to begin with, if nobody
but an inner circle of cognoscenti are in the know?
The
appreciation of poetry also seems to be a seasonal thing. We turn to poetry at
certain points in life, certain times of the year, or when hit by some emotion.
Some of us even feel the need to write
poetry during those times. There is something that poetry can give that other
forms of art or literature cannot. We feel, when we read good poetry, an
affinity with the poet’s sentiments, pleasure at a deft turn of phrase, a sense
of satisfaction at a brilliant simile or metaphor. And there is the same
pleasure in writing poetry, regardless of whether it turns out to be any good
or not.
So in answer to
the question, what use is poetry? we can say that it’s uses are subtle, multifaceted,
sometimes elliptical and usually indirect. If we did away with poetry, humanity
would be all the weaker for it. If there were no more poetry, something
irreplaceable would have been lost and the common mind of mankind would suffer
as a result. Poetry does have a use, but in a sense we could only detect it by
its absence.
Labels: Dylan Thomas, e.e. cummings, Edgar Allan Poe, Emily Dickinson, English teachers, Frank O’Hara, Langston Hughes, Maya Angelou, Robert Frost, TS Eliot, William Carlos Williams